• Albania Albania
  • Argentina Argentina
  • Australia Australia
  • Austria Austria
  • Belarus Belarus
  • Belgium Belgium
  • Brazil Brazil
  • Bulgaria Bulgaria
  • Canada Canada
  • Chile Chile
  • China China
  • Colombia Colombia
  • Costa Rica Costa Rica
  • Croatia Croatia
  • Czech Republic Czech Republic
  • Denmark Denmark
  • Egypt Egypt
  • Estonia Estonia
  • Finland Finland
  • France France
  • Georgia Georgia
  • Germany Germany
  • Greece Greece
  • Hong Kong Hong Kong
  • Hungary Hungary
  • India India
  • Indonesia Indonesia
  • Ireland Ireland
  • Israel Israel
  • Italy Italy
  • Japan Japan
  • Kazakhstan Kazakhstan
  • Korea Korea
  • Latvia Latvia
  • Lithuania Lithuania
  • Luxembourg Luxembourg
  • Mexico Mexico
  • Montenegro Montenegro
  • Morocco Morocco
  • Myanmar Myanmar
  • Netherlands Netherlands
  • New Zealand New Zealand
  • Norway Norway
  • Pakistan Pakistan
  • Panama Panama
  • Peru Peru
  • Philippines Philippines
  • Poland Poland
  • Portugal Portugal
  • Qatar Qatar
  • Romania Romania
  • Russia Russia
  • Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
  • Serbia Serbia
  • Singapore Singapore
  • Slovakia Slovakia
  • South Africa South Africa
  • Spain Spain
  • Sweden Sweden
  • Taiwan Taiwan
  • Thailand Thailand
  • Turkey Turkey
  • Ukraine Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom United Kingdom
  • United States United States
  • Vietnam Vietnam

A Tale Of Two Class Bs

By Jay Norman, Colliers Research Intern - Fall/Winter 2017 | December 2017

Almost 10 years after the economic downturn, the recovery that followed hasn’t been the same in all areas of the market. While Class A product has bounced back across Greater Boston, Class B product tells a different story.


The previous chart shows occupied space in Class B buildings in Boston and the suburbs, indexed to the peak of the last cycle, around the middle of 2008. Following the downturn, the Class B market in Boston took five years to return to occupancy levels at the height of the last cycle. However, the Class B market in the suburbs has not yet reached those levels, and almost a decade later has only 95% of the occupancy at the previous peak. This differs from the downturn in 2000, when both Boston and suburban Class B markets recovered together in about seven years.

So why is the suburban Class B market still struggling? The next chart shows the same concept as the previous one, but compares occupancy levels of Class A and B product in the suburbs.


After the downturn, Class A product dipped only slightly in occupancy levels, but just a year removed from the decline had already recovered and had more occupied space than at the height of the cycle. This trend — fueled at first by lower rents and more recently by build-to-suit developments — has continued too, with no signs of stopping.

Given these points, there has clearly been a flight to quality within the suburbs. After the downturn, Class A landlords were more aggressive about leasing, resulting in lower rents and an opportunity for tenants to trade up as the gap between Class A and B rents closed. In fact, just a year after the downturn, the rent differential between Class A and B product in the suburbs had decreased by 25%. With newfound purchasing power, tenants seized the moment to move into newer spaces with better amenities. Class A space in the suburbs, especially office parks, can offer lifestyle perks such as fitness centers, retail, and restaurants; some parks even boast a hotel and apartments. These amenities have come to be expected by suburban tenants, and landlords who can provide them are in a better position to compete.


Subscribe to Colliers In Focus Blog Posts